首页> 外文OA文献 >Treatment of Asthma Exacerbations with the Human-Powered Nebuliser: A Randomised Parallel-Group Clinical Trial
【2h】

Treatment of Asthma Exacerbations with the Human-Powered Nebuliser: A Randomised Parallel-Group Clinical Trial

机译:人工雾化器治疗哮喘急性发作:随机平行组临床试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Aims: The aim of this study was to compare a low-cost, human-powered nebuliser compressor with an electric nebuliser compressor for the treatment of mild to moderate asthma exacerbations in adults and children.Methods: This was a non-blinded, parallel-group, equivalence study, with 110 subjects between 6 and 65 years of age, conducted in the emergency department of a district hospital in Ilopango, El Salvador. Participants were assigned by random allocation to receive a 2.5-mg dose of salbutamol from the experimental human-powered nebuliser or the electric nebuliser control. All assigned participants completed treatment and were included in analysis. The study was not blinded as this was clinically unfeasible; however, data analysis was blinded.Results: The mean improvement in peak flow of the experimental and control groups was 37.5 (95% confidence interval (CI) 26.7–48.2) l/min and 38.7 (95% CI, 26.1–51.3) l/min, respectively, with a mean difference of 1.3 (95% CI, −15.1 to 17.7) l/min. The mean improvement in percent-expected peak flow for the experimental and control groups was 12.3% (95% CI, 9.1–15.5%) and 13.8% (95% CI, 9.8–17.9%), respectively, with a mean difference of 1.5% (95% CI, −3.6 to 6.6%).Conclusions: The human-powered nebuliser compressor is equivalent to a standard nebuliser compressor for the treatment of mild-to-moderate asthma. (Funded by the Opus Dean’s Fund, Marquette University College of Engineering; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01795742.)
机译:目的:本研究的目的是将低成本,人力驱动的雾化器压缩机与电动雾化器压缩机进行比较,以治疗成人和儿童的轻度至中度哮喘急性发作。该小组在萨尔瓦多Ilopango的地区医院急诊科中进行了对等研究,研究对象为110名6至65岁的受试者。通过随机分配分配参加者,以从实验性人工雾化器或电动雾化器对照中接受2.5毫克剂量的沙丁胺醇。所有分配的参与者均完成了治疗,并纳入了分析。这项研究没有盲目性,因为这在临床上是不可行的。结果:实验组和对照组的峰值流量平均提高了37.5(95%置信区间(CI)26.7-48.2)l / min和38.7(95%CI,26.1-51.3)l / min / min,平均差分别为1.3(95%CI,-15.1至17.7)l / min。实验组和对照组的预期峰值流量百分比平均改善分别为12.3%(95%CI,9.1-15.5.5%)和13.8%(95%CI,9.8-17.9%),平均差异为1.5结论(95%CI,−3.6至6.6%)。结论:手动雾化器压缩机等效于治疗轻度至中度哮喘的标准雾化器压缩机。 (由马凯特大学工程学院Opus院长基金资助; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01795742。)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号